Weber’s law in marketing

3–4 minutes

read

Ice creams are served in a round tub and juices are served in tall slim glasses. Is there anything fuzzy about it?. Yes, indeed as a consumer we feel we were served more. If you want to test it, go ahead and pour the same amount of juice in standard measuring water bottle – you will get know how much you were actually served. A consumer normally don’t know differences when they are subtle. Though, they identify the differences when they are salient and extreme.

JND 1
Pic 1: Do we really notice these things during purchase? Source: https://consumerhelpline.wordpress.com

Ernst Heinrich Weber a psychologist of 17th century studied how people differentiate between the same stimuli in two different occasions. Imagine you are now lifting  2 pounds of chocolate in your hand and then if you lift a 2.1 pounds of chocolate in the second occasion. Will you feel the difference?.

According to Weber’s Just Noticeable Difference,  the difference between the first and second weight should around 8 – 10 % to make it feel different. Hence, the second time weight is expected to be around 2.16 – 2.20 pounds to make you feel heavy.

This principle of Weber’s law is called as “Just Noticeable Difference(JND)“. Steuart Henderson Britt (1975) wrote an article on how Weber’s law can be used in marketing. Steuart states, Weber’s principle can be applied in improving packaging, product and promotion. Also, he says if the initial stimulus is stronger it requires greater intensity in resulting stimulus to create a difference. To understand it better, if a company wants to be different from the competitors, they need to put more effort in creating such difference. For example, taste of Dr.Peppers is completely different from Coca-Cola but the colour is still the same. Hence, Dr.Peppers wanted it perceive as a Cola product but created difference in the taste to stand out from the competitor. Indeed, Dr.Peppers should have worked a lot on bringing a different taste.

Dairy milk has used Weber’s Law to stay as most fulfilling chocolate among the consumers. In the year 2012, Dairy milk standard bar chocolate weight was reduced from 49 grams to 45 grams and maintained 59 p as price. Price being the major cue in consumer decision-making, people will not normally notice the weight change. The key here is the weight, if the weight was reduced to 39 grams ( based on the findings of Weber – you need 8 -10% change to feel the difference) consumer will find the difference. Cadbury’s cleverly reduced the weight to 45 grams so the consumers will not feel the difference.

Many companies don’t change their logo drastically due to existence of JND element among consumers . When companies change the logos completely they will be looked as a different company as they go beyond the purview of JND.

Look at logo of apple(Pic 2), they have maintained the standards over the years. It is common across all the brands across the globe. History of logos and it changes are completely based on just noticeable difference. Similarly, Coca cola(Pic 3) have not changed their bottle size and colour so far to avoid inconsistency in appealing consumers.

apple1
Pic 2: Good use of Weber’s Law  – Source:https://abbeytarlinton.files.wordpress.com/
pasted-graphic-2
Pic 3: Coca Cola’s old and new bottle. Source: http://www.meditationtt.com/

In totality, companies whenever want to share good news to the consumers they project it bigger and salient. If they wish to increase the price or reduce weight of the product they ensure they don’t make it visible to the consumers (See Pic 1) ( Refer: Consumer Behaviour book by Schiffman et al).

Weber’s just noticeable difference is a great foundation to understand how people see differences in weight, light, and sound. It has been explained in terms of marketing by Steuart Henderson Britt ( Article 1, Article 2). Right use of JND will certainly increase the profitability of companies.

HOME PAGE

3 responses to “Weber’s law in marketing”

  1. Interesting blog definitely made me think. Specifically about the packaging of alcohol and how misleading quantity can be due to there varying shapes. Goes to show how hard it must be for an established brand to change its image due to the Weber’s Law. Do you think Fechner’s law is applicable in your argument and could it used in conjugation within a consumer based setting in order to increase difference amounts more the 8-10%?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weber%E2%80%93Fechner_law

    1. I do believe in Fechner’s law even in consumer settings. Since we are not realizing the change in weight of chocolates sold to us.

  2. Hi!

    I think that your post is really interesting since it addresses a crucial topic for marketers: perception.
    There are many variables that influence consumer’s perception of the product: the label, the size and form of the packages, the colours, etc. As you stablished, packages have a huge influence on how consumers interpret the product and give value to it. Especially, the size plays a very important role in the formation of perception since consumers tend to link it with the quality of the product. Yan, Sengupta and Wyer stablished in their paper “Package size and perceived quality: The intervening role of unit price perceptions”, that consumers normally associate high prices with high quality and transfer this association to small packages when the unit price is provided. This phenomenon occurs because even though the overall price (e.g. the price of 200 gr of shampoo vs 150 gr of shampoo) is lower in small packages, their unit price (e.g. the price of 1 gr) is higher (Yan, Sengupta, & Wyer Jr., 2013). However, if the overall price is the only one provided, consumers will normally give more value to larger size packages.

    Another interesting point is the influence that the size of the package has in the usage volume. According to a report from the Marketing Science Institute, since unit price in larger packages is lower than in small ones, consumers are less careful with the usage volume because the economic impact is not perceived as high. Of course, this happens only if the over-used off the product is not perceived as a threat to the well-being of the user (e.g. chemical housekeeping products Vs Shampoo) (Wansink, 1994). However, I believe that this is closely related to the category of the product and the importance that you give to it, since it is very different how you value a ml of a perfume vs a gr of a shampoo.

    Works Cited
    Wansink, B. (1994). How and Why Package Size Influences Usage Volume. Retrieved from Markeing Science Institute: http://www.msi.org/reports/how-and-why-package-size-influences-usage-volume/
    Yan, D., Sengupta, J., & Wyer Jr., R. S. (2013). Package size and perceived quality: The intervening role of unit price perceptions. Retrieved from ScienceDirect – Elsevier : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057740813000636#

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Balachandar Kaliappan

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading